0 of 1 questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the activity before. Hence you can not start it again.
Activity is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the activity.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 1 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Your responses have been sent to your facilitator who will come back to you with your results shortly.
Read the following article and answer the questions at the end.
Internet and privacy head PS breaches
By Markus Mannheim, Public Service Reporter
November 26, 2010 9:12 AM
Almost 600 federal bureaucrats breached their professional code of conduct last year.
The latest State of the Service report, issued yesterday, shows misusing the internet and improperly accessing private records remain the most common violations of the Public Service Act.
Government agencies carried out 970 investigations in 2009-10, of which three in five found a breach had taken place.
Public servants must by law adhere to a strict 13-point ethical code, which requires them to behave with honesty and integrity, use public resources properly and treat their colleagues and the public with respect.
Those who violate the code can be sacked if the breach is serious enough.
The report says 77 public servants were dismissed for misconduct in 2009-10, while a further 117 quit before the investigation finished.
However, nine in 10 bureaucrats who were found guilty of misbehaving were either reprimanded, counselled, fined or had their salary lowered.
The most common breaches were misuse of the internet or email (216 staff), improper access to personal information (120), inappropriate behaviour during work hours (85) and harassment or bullying (57).
The Public Service Commission says in the report that while the statistics vary between workplaces, ”the level of reported misconduct in the APS continues to be low, with less than four in every 1000 employees being found to have breached the code”.
It also says its surveys suggest the misconduct ”tended to be in the nature of isolated incidents of poor behaviour and judgment by individual employees rather than being indicative of any underlying systemic issues”.
The report also reveals the first operational details of the bureaucracy’s ethical advisory service, which was set up in May last year.
Throughout 2009-10, the service received 1038 inquiries from public servants who wanted confidential advice on how to deal with dilemmas in their workplace.
The most common inquiries related to reporting and managing misconduct (185 inquiries), harassment and bullying (135), recruitment (126) and conflicts of interest (91).
Answer the following questions about the article:
1. Given some of the issues highlighted in the article, how would you as an individual promote ethical standards?
2. What methods would you employ to assist staff to:
a. avoid a conflict of interest?
b. manage a conflict of interest once disclosed?
3. If a staff member came to you and raised concerns about someone in your section who has breached the professional code of conduct, how would you respond?
4. How would you use lessons learned from your investigation to increase awareness of, and decrease the number of breaches against, the code of conduct?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.