FINAL ACTIVITY 3 – Probity and Ethics Compliance Stream C & D (C000362) – Defence CBR
Activity Summary
0 of 17 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the activity before. Hence you can not start it again.
Activity is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the activity.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Results
0 of 17 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
Your responses have been sent to your facilitator who will come back to you with your results shortly.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Current
- Review
- Answered
- Correct
- Incorrect
- Question 1 of 17
1. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 2 of 17
2. Question
During a tender evaluation you receive an email from one of the Minister’s advisers. He says that the Minister is aware of the tender evaluation process and wants to put in a good word for one of the tenderers. She personally knows the CEO of the company and has been impressed with previous work they have done.
How will you deal with this email? Make sure your answer considers the factors of probity and the political context.This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 3 of 17
3. Question
You are the chairperson of a tender evaluation team and one of the members (this is their first experience with tender evaluation) appears to have developed a bias against one of the tenderers. They are consistently scoring them lower than all the other team members, and in evaluation deliberations and discussion, is very vocal with negative criticism of the tender response.
How should you manage the situation and lead the team to achieve a more consistent and fair evaluation? How can you build an effective evaluation team?This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 4 of 17
4. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 5 of 17
5. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 6 of 17
6. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 7 of 17
7. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 8 of 17
8. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 9 of 17
9. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 10 of 17
10. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 11 of 17
11. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 12 of 17
12. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 13 of 17
13. Question
How can you personally contribute to an ethical public-sector workplace?
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 14 of 17
14. Question
During a tender evaluation you receive an email from one of the Minister’s advisers. He says that the Minister is aware of the tender evaluation process and wants to put in a good word for one of the tenderers. She personally knows the CEO of the company and has been impressed with previous work they have done.
How will you deal with this email? Make sure your answer considers the factors of probity and the political context.This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 15 of 17
15. Question
During a tender evaluation you receive an email from one of the Minister’s advisers. He says that the Minister is aware of the tender evaluation process and wants to put in a good word for one of the tenderers. She personally knows the CEO of the company and has been impressed with previous work they have done.
How will you deal with this email? Make sure your answer considers the factors of probity and the political context.This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 16 of 17
16. Question
During a tender evaluation you receive an email from one of the Minister’s advisers. He says that the Minister is aware of the tender evaluation process and wants to put in a good word for one of the tenderers. She personally knows the CEO of the company and has been impressed with previous work they have done.
How will you deal with this email? Make sure your answer considers the factors of probity and the political context.This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
- Question 17 of 17
17. Question
During a tender evaluation you receive an email from one of the Minister’s advisers. He says that the Minister is aware of the tender evaluation process and wants to put in a good word for one of the tenderers. She personally knows the CEO of the company and has been impressed with previous work they have done.
How will you deal with this email? Make sure your answer considers the factors of probity and the political context.This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.